¿De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de educación STEAM?Una revisión de experiencias educativas

  1. David Aguilera 1
  2. José Miguel Vílchez González 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada(España)
Revue:
Revista Fuentes

ISSN: 1575-7072,  2172-7775

Année de publication: 2024

Volumen: 26

Volumen: 2

Pages: 212-224

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista Fuentes

Résumé

Desde el origen del emergente enfoque educativo STEAM hasta la actualidad han surgido diversas perspectivas que conllevan la adopción de distintas vías para implementar una intervención educativa. Este hecho parece estar conduciendo a una peligrosa polisemia que no facilita la labor docente e incluso podría restar potencial a su intención inicial: mostrar los vínculos entre las disciplinas y favorecer el gusto por su aprendizaje. Este estudio persigue dos objetivos: (1) dilucidar la conceptualización que realizan los autores sobre la educación STEAM; y (2) analizar aquellas intervenciones educativas que integran las cinco disciplinas del acrónimo.Para arrojar luz al asunto se ha realizado una revisión sistemática de la literatura publicada durante el periodo 2015-2020e indexada en Web of Science. Tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión,fueron seleccionados20 artículos. Los principales resultados apuntan que: (1) la calidad de la fundamentación teórica de los trabajos determina la calidad de la“intervención STEAM” desarrollada; (2) no existe consenso en cuanto a los significados otorgados a la “A” de STEAM; y (3) el modo de integración disciplinar preferente es a partir de un contexto concreto, siendo los de carácter histórico o cultural los más utilizados.Se finaliza apuntando la conveniencia de continuar esta línea de trabajo hasta consensuar un marco teórico para la educación STEAM que dirija el diseño de propuestas educativas, así como la necesidad de evaluar su eficacia en las aulas.

Références bibliographiques

  • Acan, S.C., & Acan, N.L. (2019). Music notes to amino acid sequence: A STEAM approach to study protein structure. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(6), 669-671.
  • Aguilar-Esteva, V., Tobón, S., & Juárez-Hernández, L. G. (2019). Construcción y validación de instrumento para evaluar el avance del enfoque socioformativo y adopción de nuevos modelos educativos en el nivel superior en México. Revista Espacios, 40(31), 5.
  • Aguilar-Esteva, V., Juárez-Hernández, L. G., & Acosta-Banda, A. (2021). Validez de Constructo y Confiabilidad de un Instrumento para Evaluar la Integración del Enfoque Socioformativo en las Prácticas Docentes en Instituciones de Educación Superior en México. Revista Fuentes, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2021.12905
  • Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM Education and Student Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 11, 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
  • Baek, Y., Park, H., Kim, Y., No, S., Park, J., Lee, J., Jung, J., Choi, Y., & Han, H. (2011). STEAM Education in Korea. Journal of Learner-centered Curriculum Instruction, 11(4), 149-171.
  • Boy, G.A. (2013). From STEM to STEAM: Toward a human-centred education, creativity & learning thinking. Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. Université Toulouse le Mirail: France.http://go.nasa.gov/3aWLjJJ
  • Bryan, L.A., Moore, T.J., Johnson, C.C. & Roehrig, G.H. (2015). Integrated STEM education. In C.C. Johnson, E.E. Peters-Burton & T.J. Moore (Eds.), STEM Road Map: A framework for integrated STEM education (pp. 23-37). New York: Routledge.
  • Caprile, M., Palmén, R., Sanz, P., & Dente, G. (2015). Encouraging STEM studies: Labour market situation and comparison of practices targeted at young people in different member states. Brussels: European Union. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3bNi2AG
  • Carter, C.E., Barnett, H., Burns, K., Cohen, N., Durall, E., Lordick, D., Nack, F., Newman, A., & Ussher, S. (2021). Defining STEAM Approaches for Higher Education. European Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/11354
  • Chen, C.C., & Huang, P.H. (2020). The effects of STEAM-based mobile learning on learning achievement and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1761838
  • Chien, Y.H., & Chu, P.Y. (2018). The Different Learning Outcomes of High School and College Students on a 3D-Printing STEAM Engineering Design Curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(6), 1047-1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9832-4
  • Chiu, M., & Duit, R. (2011). Globalization : Science Education from an International Perspective. Journal of Reseach in Science Teaching, 48(6), 553–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20427
  • Chung, C. C., Huang, S. L., Cheng, Y. M., & Lou, S. J. (2020). Using an iSTEAM project-based learning model for technology senior high school students: Design, development, and evaluation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09643-5
  • Clapp, E.P., & Jimenez, R.L. (2016). Implementing STEAM in maker-centered learning. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000066
  • Clark, A.C., & Ernst, J.V. (2006). A model for the integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The Technology Teacher, 66, 24–26.
  • Cooper, R., & Heaverlo, C. (2013). Problem solving and creativity and design: What influence do they have on girls' interest in STEM subject areas? American Journal of Engineering Education, 4(1), 27-38.
  • Evans, M.A., Lopez, M., Maddox, D., Drape, T., & Duke, R. (2015). Interest-driven learning among middle school youth in an out-of-school STEM studio. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(5), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9490-z
  • Friedman, T.L. (2005). The World is Flat. A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Gaquere-Parker, A.C., Doles, N.A., & Parker, C.D. (2016). Chemistry and art in a bag: An easy-to-implement outreach activity making and painting with a copper-based pigment. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 152-153. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00364
  • García-Carmona, A. (2020). STEAM, ¿una nueva distracción para la enseñanza de la ciencia? Ápice. Revista de Educación Científica, 4(2), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.17979/arec.2020.4.2.6533
  • Garrett, R.M. (1987). Issues in science education: problem-solving, creativity and originality. International Journal of Science Education, 9(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069870090201
  • Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices. The STEAM Journal, 1(2), 15.
  • Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
  • Jeong, S., & Kim, H. (2015). The Effect of a Climate Change Monitoring Program on Students' Knowledge and Perceptions of STEAM Education in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1321-1338. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1390a
  • Jolly, A. (2014). STEM vs. STEAM: Do the arts belong? Education week: Teacher. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/37MsA1y
  • Karppinen, S., Kallunki, V., & Komulainen, K. (2019). Interdisciplinary craft designing and invention pedagogy in teacher education: student teachers creating smart textiles. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9436-x
  • Kim, H., & Chae, D.H. (2016). The Development and Application of a STEAM Program Based on Traditional Korean Culture. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(7), 1925-1936. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1539a
  • Kim, P. W. (2016). The Wheel Model of STEAM Education Based on Traditional Korean Scientific Contents. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2353-2371. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1263a
  • KOFAC (2017). Concept and definition of STEAM. Seoul: The Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3dNRNfM
  • Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: background, federal policy, and legislative action. Congressional Research Service Reports. Paper 35. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2NygO49
  • Land, M.H. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317
  • Lin, C.L., & Tsai, C.Y. (2020). The Effect of a Pedagogical STEAM Model on Students’ Project Competence and Learning Motivation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09885-x
  • Maeda, J. (2013). STEM + Art = STEAM. The STEAM Journal, 1(1), Article 34. DOI: 10.5642/steam.201301.34
  • Margerko, B., Freeman, J., Mcklin, T., Reilly, M., Livingston, E., Mccoid, S., & Crews-Brown, A. (2016). Earsketch: A steam-based approach for underrepresented populations in high school computer science education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 16(4), 14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2886418
  • Martín‐Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales‐Palacios, F.J., Vílchez‐González, J.M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103, 799-822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522
  • Miller, J., & Knezek, G. (2013). STEAM for student engagement. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (pp. 3288–3298). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. http://bit.ly/2Msrm45
  • Ozkan, G., & Topsakal, U.U. (2019). Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM design processes on middle school students’ creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09547-z
  • Ozkan, G., & Topsakal, U.U. (2020). Investigating the effectiveness of STEAM education on students’ conceptual understanding of force and energy topics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1769586
  • Park, H., Kim, Y., Nho, S., Lee, J., Jung, J., Choi, Y., Han, H. & Baek, Y. (2012). Components of 4C-STEAM Education and a Checklist for the Instructional Design. Journal of learner-centered Curriculum Instruction, 12(4), 533-557.
  • Pearson, G. (2017). National academies piece on integrated STEM. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1289781
  • Piscitelli, A. (2008). Nativos digitales. Contratexto, 16, 43-56.
  • Quigley, C.F., & Herro, D. (2016). Finding the joy in the unknown: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z
  • Quigley, C.F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F.M. (2017). Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1-2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201
  • Quinn, C. M., Reid, J. W., & Gardner, G. E. (2020). S+ T+ M= E as a convergent model for the nature of STEM. Science & Education, 29(4), 881-898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00130-w
  • Roehrig, G.H., Moore, T.J., Wang, H.H., & Park, M.S. (2012). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00112.x
  • Ruiz-Vicente, F., Zapatera-Llinares, A., & Montes-Sánchez, N. (2020). Curriculum analysis and design, implementation, and validation of a STEAM project through educational robotics in primary education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Special Issue, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22373
  • Salmi, H.S., Thuneberg, H., & Bogner, F.X. (2020). Is there deep learning on Mars? STEAM education in an inquiry-based out-of-school setting. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1823856
  • Saorín, J.L., Melian-Diaz, D., Bonnet, A., Carbonell, C., Meier, C., & De La Torre-Cantero, J. (2017). Makerspace teaching-learning environment to enhance creative competence in engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.01.004
  • Serrano-Pérez, E., & Juárez-López, F. (2019). An ultra‐low cost line follower robot as educational tool for teaching programming and circuit's foundations. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(2), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22074
  • Shin, Y. & Han, S. (2011). A Study of the Elementary School Teachers` Perception in STEAM Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics) Education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(4), 514-523.
  • Sullivan, A., & Bers, M.U. (2018). Dancing robots: integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9397-0
  • Thuneberg, H.M., Salmi, H.S., & Bogner, F.X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003
  • Wu, R., Brinkema, C., Peterson, M., Waltzer, A., & Chowning, J. (2018). STEAM Connections: Painting with Bacteria. The American Biology Teacher, 80(4), 305-307.
  • Yakman, G. (2008). STEAM education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education, presented at the Pupils' Attitudes Towards Technology (PATT-19) Conference: Research on Technology, Innovation, Design & Engineering Teaching, Salt Lake City, Utah: USA.
  • Yakman, G., & Lee, H. (2012). Exploring the exemplary STEAM education in the US as a practical educational framework for Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(6), 1072-1086.
  • Zamorano, T., García, Y., & Reyes, D. (2018). The education for the 21st centurysubject: Main features of the STEAM approach from the educational point of view [Educación para el sujeto del siglo XXI: principales características del enfoque STEAM desde la mirada educacional]. Contextos: Estudios de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, 41. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2O1GnKP
La source de données: Dialnet