Creación, evaluación e implementación de la aplicación para la Educación Superior MoILCaps

  1. David Caballero-Mariscal 1
  2. María Pinto 1
  3. Alicia Segura 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Duquesne University
    info

    Duquesne University

    Pittsburgh, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/02336z538

Revista:
Biblios: Revista electrónica de bibliotecología, archivología y museología

ISSN: 1562-4730

Año de publicación: 2024

Número: 86

Páginas: 197-219

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5195/BIBLIOS.2023.1015 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Biblios: Revista electrónica de bibliotecología, archivología y museología

Resumen

Objetivo. Crear, evaluar e implementar la eficacia de la aplicación MoILCaps en el contexto de la educación superior. Con fundamento en las teorías cognitiva, constructivista y conectivista, se ha desarrollado una app con un modelo de diseño instruccional basado en la experiencia del usuario. Está destinada al autoaprendizaje por parte del estudiantado de Ciencias Sociales. Método. Con la colaboración tanto del profesorado como del estudiantado se elaboró la aplicación, siguiendo el modelo Análisis, Diseño, Desarrollo y Evaluación (ADDIE), por medio de las fases de análisis, diseño, desarrollo, implementación y evaluación. La última fase proporcionó las propuestas de mejora para la optimización de la versión final de la herramienta, una web progresiva de acceso abierto. Resultados. La aplicación desarrollada se organiza en seis cápsulas que siguen el marco de ACRL (Association of College and Research Libraries) para la alfabetización informacional en educación superior (2015): aprender, buscar, evaluar, crear, investigar y difundir. Incluye recursos multimedia en forma de microcontenidos que ponen en relieve la legibilidad, organización y visualización como características claves. Este modelo de app centrada en la experiencia del usuario constituye un instrumento relevante para fomentar la docencia de ALFIN (Alfabetización Informacional) por parte del profesorado y la biblioteca. Conclusiones. Los diferentes análisis, seguidos de las propuestas de mejora y las revisiones, conllevaron la consecución de una aplicación de gran utilidad para el estudiantado, el profesorado y la biblioteca. Las bibliotecas, junto al profesorado, juegan un papel crucial como agentes activos en la formación de la alfabetización informacional, que se ha de adaptar a la incorporación de las tecnologías móviles en respuesta a las necesidades de la sociedad actual.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adrakatti, A. F., & Mulla, K. R. (2017). A realistic approach to information services on mobile apps. Journal of Access Services, 14(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15367967.2017.1287573
  • Allela, M. A., Ogange, B. O., Junaid, M. I., & Charles, P. B. (2020). Effectiveness of Multimodal Microlearning for In-service Teacher Training. Journal of Learning for Development, 7(3), 384-398. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1280612
  • Alnajdi, S. M. (2018). The Effectiveness of Designing and Using a Practical Interactive Lesson Based on ADDIE Model to Enhance Students' Learning Performances in University of Tabuk. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 212-221. . https://doi.org/110.5539/jel.v7n6p212
  • Basile, A., & Matis, S. (2018). Is there an app for that? A review of mobile apps for information literacy classes. College & Research Libraries News, 79(10). https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.10.546
  • Batsaikhan, A. & Hachinger, S. (2023). A Progressive Web App Template for Citizen Science Projects Involving Spatial Data Collection. 2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science), Limassol, Cyprus, 2023, pp. 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1109/e-Science58273.2023.10254925
  • Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., & Crompton, H. (2020). Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101827
  • Broderick, A., Mehta-Parekh, H., & Reid, D. K. (2005). Differentiating instruction for disabled students in inclusive classrooms. Theory into practice, 44(3), 194-202. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_3
  • Broderick, D. (2014). Collaborative design: Participatory culture meets multiliteracies in a high school literary arts community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(3), 198-208. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/171873/
  • Brooks, C., & McCormack, M. (2020). Driving Digital Transformation in Higher Education. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2020/6/driving-digital-transformation-in-higher-education
  • Budoya, C., Kissaka, M., & Mtebe, J. (2019). Instructional design enabled Agile method using ADDIE model and Feature Driven Development method. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 15(1), 1-14. http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/
  • Charles, L. H. (2021). Using a TeachMeet model to enhance collaboration in an information literacy instruction program. The Journal of academic librarianship, 47(5), 102393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102393
  • Chen, O., Woolcott, G., & Sweller, J. (2017). Using cognitive load theory to structure computer‐based learning including MOOCs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(4), 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12188
  • Chen, Y. C., Fan, K. K., & Fang, K. T. (2021). Effect of flipped teaching on cognitive load level with mobile devices: the case of a graphic design course. Sustainability, 13(13), 7092. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137092
  • Demir, K., & Akpinar, E. (2018). The Effect of Mobile Learning Applications on Students' Academic Achievement and Attitudes toward Mobile Learning. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137092
  • Denke, J., Jarson, J., & Sinno, S. (2020). Making the Invisible Visible: Enhancing Information Literacy and Metacognition with a Constructivist Activity. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2020.140207
  • Divayana, D. G. H., Ariawan, I. P. W., Ardana, I. M., & Suyasa, P. W. A. (2021). Utilization of alkin-wp-based digital library evaluation software as evaluation tool of digital library effectiveness. Emerging Science Journal, 5(5), 731-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01308
  • Downes, S. (2005). Feature: E-learning 2.0. Elearn magazine, 1, 1- 30. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-2-7
  • Falloon, G. (2017). Mobile devices and apps as scaffolds to science learning in the primary classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(6), 613-628. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45151242
  • Fedeli, L. (2017). School, curriculum and technology: the what and how of their connections. Education Sciences & Society-Open Access, 8(2), 1-12. https://doi.org 10.3280/ess2-2017oa5595
  • Fedyk, M., & Xu, F. (2018). The epistemology of rational constructivism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(2), 343-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0372-1
  • Frydenberg, M., & Andone, D. (2016). Creating micro-videos to demonstrate technology learning and digital literacy. Technology learning and digital literacy, 13 (4), 261-273. https://doi.org/110.1108/ITSE-09-2016-0030
  • Frydenberg, M., & Lorenz, B. (2020). Lizards in the Street! Introducing Cybersecurity Awareness in a Digital Literacy Context. Information Systems Education Journal, 18(4), 33-45. https://isedj.org/; http://iscap.info
  • Gezgin, D. M. (2019). The effect of mobile learning approach on university students' academic success for database management systems course. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 17(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2019010102
  • Gretter, S., & Yadav, A. (2018). What do preservice teachers think about teaching media literacy? An exploratory study using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(1), 104-123. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2018-10-1-6
  • Gross, M., Latham, D., & Julien, H. (2018). What the framework means to me: Attitudes of academic librarians toward the ACRL framework for information literacy for higher education. Library & information science research, 40(3-4), 262-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000619891762
  • Guedes, R., Valois, R., Costa, A., & Delineau, V. (2020). AcademicMind-The mindfulness app for academics. European Journal of Public Health, 30(Supplement_5), ckaa166-021. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.021
  • Guo, J., & Huang, J. (2021). Information literacy education during the pandemic: The cases of academic libraries in Chinese top universities. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(4), 102363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102363
  • Guo-hua, W. U. (2019). Design and Develop of Teaching APP System for Vocational School Based on ADDIE Model. Computer & Telecommunication, 1(3), 17-19. https://doi.org/10.4000/ctd.7556
  • Han, T. I. (2020). A Study on the Characteristics Satisfaction in Digital Convergence based Micro-Learning. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(6), 287-295. https://doi.org/ doi.10.26754/uz.978-84-16723-97-3
  • Hanbidge, A. S., Tin, T., & Sanderson, N. (2018). Information Literacy Skills on the Go: Mobile Learning Innovation. Journal of Information Literacy, 12(1).1-10. https://doi.org/10.11645/12.1.2322
  • Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. (2019). Agile UX design for a quality user experience (Second). Morgan Kaufmann Ed. https://doi.org/10.11645/12.1.2322
  • Head, A. J., Bull, A. C., & MacMillan, M. (2019). Asking the right questions: Bridging gaps between information literacy assessment approaches. Against the Grain, 31(4), 10. https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.8408
  • Jahnke, I., Lee, Y. M., Pham, M., He, H., & Austin, L. (2020). Unpacking the inherent design principles of mobile microlearning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(3), 585-619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09413-w
  • Janssen, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: towards a research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1, 23-35 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09729-5
  • Javorcik, T., & Polasek, R. (2019). Transformation of e-learning into microlearning: New approach to course design. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2116, No. 1, p. 060016). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5114051
  • Keyes, C., Shroff, R. H., & Linger, W. (2015). Addressing Design Issues In Mobile Applications Supporting Ubiquitous Learning. Advances in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1),1-15. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Addressing-design-issues-in-mobile-applications-Keyes-Shroff/eb06713c3f7c4c528519fd4268dc5ef7761d49ee
  • Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in physiology education, 40(2), 147-156.s https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2015
  • Lee, C. J., & Choi, S. W. (2021). A New Normal of Lifelong Education According to the Artificial Intelligence and EduTech Industry Trends and the Spread of the Untact Trend. In Software Engineering in IoT, Big Data, Cloud and Mobile Computing (pp. 191-205). Springer, Cham. Software Engineering in IoT, Big Data, Cloud and Mobile Computing 3030647722, 9783030647728
  • Lee, Y. M., Jahnke, I., & Austin, L. (2021). Mobile microlearning design and effects on learning efficacy and learner experience. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 885-915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09931-w
  • Li, J., Antonenko, P. D., & Wang, J. (2019). Trends and issues in multimedia learning research in 1996–2016: A bibliometric analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100282
  • Lin, H. C. S., Yu, S. J., Sun, J. C. Y., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2021). Engaging university students in a library guide through wearable spherical video-based virtual reality: Effects on situational interest and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(8), 1272-1287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1624579
  • Liu, W. (2021). Knowledge map: a creative visual path to library guides and resources. The Electronic Library, 38 (5/6), 943-962. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-03-2020-0055
  • Magoi, J. S., Abrizah, A., & Aspura, M. Y. I. (2020). Shaping library’s social media authority through trust-creating activities: A case of selected academic libraries in Nigeria. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 25(1), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol25no1.5
  • Mansouri, S., Alhadidi, T., Chabchoub, S., & Salah, R. B. (2018). Impedance cardiography: recent applications and developments. Biomed Res, 29(19), 3542-52. https://doi.org/10.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-17-3479
  • Miller, S. D. (2018). Diving deep: Reflective questions for identifying tacit disciplinary information literacy knowledge practices, dispositions, and values through the ACRL Framework for information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(3), 412-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2019.1621186
  • Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance improvement, 42(5), 34-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4930420508
  • Molenda, M. (2015). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance improvement, 54(2), 40-42. https://doi.org/:10.1002/pfi .4930420508
  • Müller, F. A., & Wulf, T. (2021). Blended learning environments that work: An evidence-based instructional design for the delivery of qualitative management modules. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100530
  • Mullins, K. (2014). Good IDEA: Instructional design model for integrating information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(3-4), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.012
  • Mullins, K. (2016). IDEA model from theory to practice: integrating information literacy in academic courses. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(1), 55-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.012
  • Mullins, K. (2017). Research Plus™ mobile app: information literacy “On the Go”. Reference Services Review, 45, 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-03-2016-0020
  • Mutlu-Bayraktar, D., Cosgun, V., & Altan, T. (2019). Cognitive load in multimedia learning environments: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 141, 103618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103618
  • Narayan, V., Herrington, J., & Cochrane, T. (2019). Design principles for heutagogical learning: Implementing student-determined learning with mobile and social media tools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 1-11. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6833-706X
  • Nesbit, J. C., K. Y. Belfer y J. Vargo. 2002. “A convergent participation model forevaluation of learning objects”. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 28 (3), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.21432/T25C8C
  • Nikou, S., & Aavakare, M. (2021). An assessment of the interplay between literacy and digital technology in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 1-23, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10451-0
  • Nokelainen, P. (2006). An Empirical Assessment of Pedagogical Usability Criteria for Digital Learning Material with Elementary School Students. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 178–197. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/an-empirical-assesment-of-pedagogical-usability-criteria-for-digi
  • Ozer, O., & Kılıç, F. (2018). The effect of mobile-assisted language learning environment on EFL students’ academic achievement, cognitive load and acceptance of mobile learning tools. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2915-2928. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90992
  • Park, Y., & Kim, Y. (2018). A design and Development of micro-Learning Content in e-Learning System. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 8(1), 56-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.1.2698
  • Park, H., Kim, H. S., & Park, H. W. (2020). A scientometric study of digital literacy, ICT literacy, information literacy, and media literacy. Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(2), 116-138. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2478/jdis-2021-0001
  • Park, H., Kim, H. S., & Park, H. W. (2021). A scientometric study of digital literacy, ICT literacy, information literacy, and media literacy. Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(2), 116-138. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10639-021-10832-5
  • Parsazadeh, N., Ali, R., & Rezaei, M. (2018). A framework for cooperative and interactive mobile learning to improve online information evaluation skills. Computers & Education, 120, 75-89. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.010
  • Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., Mccormack, M., Reeves, J., Bozkurt, A., Crawfurd, S., Czerniewicz, L., Gibson, R., Linder, K., Mason, J., & Mondelli, V. (2021). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report. Teaching and Learning Edition. In Educause. https://www.educause.edu/horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-2021.
  • Pinto, M., Gómez-Camarero, C., Fernández-Ramos, A., & Vinciane-Doucet, A. (2017). Evaluareed: desarrollo de una herramienta para la evaluación de la calidad de los recursos educativos electrónicos. Investigación Bibliotecológica. Archivonomía, Bibliotecología e Información, 31(72), 227. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2017.72.57831
  • Pinto, M., Fernández-Pascual, R., Caballero-Mariscal, D., Sales, D., Guerrero, D., & Uribe, A. (2019). Scientific production on mobile information literacy in higher education: a bibliometric analysis (2006–2017). Scientometrics, 120(1), 57-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03115-x
  • Pinto, M., Sales, D., Fernández-Pascual, R., & Caballero-Mariscal, D. (2020). Attitudes, perceptions and prospectings on mobile information literacy training: Design and validation of the MOBILE-APP questionnaire. Journal of librarianship and information science, 52(1), 208-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618788726
  • Pinto, M., Caballero, D., Sales, D., & Fernández-Pascual, R. (2020). MOBILE-APPS questionnaire: Developing and validating a scale to measure the attitudes and perceptions of undergraduate students on mobile information literacy. Journal of librarianship and information science, 52(4), 1063-1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620902260
  • Pinto, M., Mariscal, D. C., & Segura, A. (2021). Experiences of information literacy and mobile technologies amongst undergraduates in times of COVID. A qualitative approach. Aslib Journal of Information Management,74 (2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03523-4
  • Polizzi, G. (2020). Digital literacy and the national curriculum for England: Learning from how the experts engage with and evaluate online content. Computers & Education, 152, 103859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103859
  • Ramsey, E., & Vecchione, A. (2014). Engaging library users through a social media strategy. Journal of Library Innovation, 5(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308515443_Engaging_library_users_through_a_social_media_strategy
  • Rapchak, M. E. (2018). Collaborative learning in an information literacy course: The impact of online versus face-to-face instruction on social metacognitive awareness. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(3), 383-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.03.003
  • Reynolds, K.M., Roberts, L.M. and Hauck, J. (2017), Exploring motivation: integrating the ARCS model with instruction Reference Services Review, 45 (2), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-10-2016-0057
  • Roberts, L. (2017). Research in the real world: Improving adult learners web search and evaluation skills through motivational design and problem-based learning. College & Research Libraries, 78(4), 527. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.4.527
  • Rodgers, A. R., & Puterbaugh, M. (2017). Digital badges and library instructional programs: Academic library case study. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 29(4), 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2017.1378542
  • Rudolph, M. (2017). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Online Higher Education, 1(2), 1-17. https://doaj.org/article/55846c6b431d4a3ca1bd2020eeac11b1
  • Sales, D., Cuevas-Cerveró, A., & Gómez-Hernández, J. A. (2020). Perspectivas sobre la competencia informacional y digital de estudiantes y docentes de Ciencias Sociales antes y durante el confinamiento por la Covid-19. Profesional de la información, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.23
  • Saroia, A. I., & Gao, S. (2019). Investigating university students’ intention to use mobile learning management systems in Sweden. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(5), 569-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1557068
  • Schroeder, N. L., & Cenkci, A. T. (2020). Do measures of cognitive load explain the spatial split-attention principle in multimedia learning environments? A systematic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 254-ss. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000372
  • Shail, M. S. (2019). Using micro-learning on mobile applications to increase knowledge retention and work performance: a review of literature. Cureus, 11(8), 1-18. https:/doi:10.7759/cureus.5307
  • Sheng Lin, H. C., Yu, S. J., Sun, J. C. Y., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2019). Engaging university students in a library guide through wearable spherical video-based virtual reality: Effects on situational interest and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-16, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1624579
  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1),1-15. http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
  • Simmons, D. E. (2002). The forum report: E-learning adoption rates and barriers. In A. Rossett (Ed.), The ASTD e-learninghandbook (pp. 19– 23). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
  • Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
  • Van Bergen, P., & Parsell, M. (2019). Comparing radical, social and psychological constructivism in Australian higher education: a psycho-philosophical perspective. The Australian Educational Researcher, 46(1), 41-58. . https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0285-8
  • Visvizi, A., Jussila, J., Lytras, M. D., & Ijäs, M. (2020). Tweeting and mining OECD-related microcontent in the post-truth era: A cloud-based app. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 105958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.022
  • Walsh, J. (2017). Connectivism: networked learning for a digital Era. Teacher Learning Network, 24(2), 9-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C37-2011-02-05
  • Wang, X. (2019). Research on College English Micro-learning Based on Mobile Terminal. The FronLtiers of Society, Science and Technology, 1(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.25236/FSST.20190211
  • Wang, X. (2019)b. Innovation of College English Teaching Model Based on Mobile Micro-learning Technology. Frontiers in Educational Research, 2(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.25236/FER.033026
  • Wang, Z., Gong, S. Y., Xu, S., & Hu, X. E. (2019). Elaborated feedback and learning: Examining cognitive and motivational influences. Computers & Education, 136, https://doi.org/130-140. 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.003
  • Yates, D., Frydenberg, M., Waguespack, L., McDermott, I., OConnell, J., Chen, F., & Babb, J. S. (2019). Dotting i’s and Crossing T’s: Integrating Breadth and Depth in an Undergraduate Cybersecurity Course. Information Systems Education Journal, 17(6), 41. https://isedj.org/2019-17/n6/ISEDJv17n6p41.html
  • Yoon, M., Lee, J., & Jo, I. H. (2021). Video learning analytics: Investigating behavioral patterns and learner clusters in video-based online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, 100806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100806
  • Zagami, J., Bocconi, S., Starkey, L., Wilson, J. D., Gibson, D., Downie, J., ... & Elliott, S. (2018). Creating future ready information technology policy for national education systems. Technology, knowledge and learning, 23(3), 495-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9387-7
  • Zhang, L., Li, X., Wang, J., Ma, X., & Xu, M. (2017). Construction of Mobile Teaching Model Based on Connectivism Learning Theory in Cloud Environment. Journal of Computers, 28(4), 215-226. https://doi.org/10.3966/199115592017082804023
  • Zhang, J., & West, R. E. (2020). Designing Microlearning Instruction for ProfessionalDevelopment Through a Competency Based Approach. TechTrends, 64(2), 310-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00449-4
  • Zhong, H. X., Chiu, P. S., & Lai, C. F. (2021). Effects of the Use of CDIO Engineering Design in a Flipped Programming Course on Flow Experience. Cognitive Load. Sustainability, 13(3), 1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031381
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet