Prevalence of elder abuse in the community and care settingsAn umbrella review

  1. B. Juhász 1
  2. Khalid Saed Khan
  3. Naomi Cano Ibañez
  4. Aurora Bueno Cavanillas
  5. José Matías Triviño Juárez
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Zeitschrift:
Semergen: revista española de medicina de familia

ISSN: 1138-3593

Datum der Publikation: 2024

Nummer: 6

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.1016/J.SEMERG.2024.102209 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Andere Publikationen in: Semergen: revista española de medicina de familia

Zusammenfassung

Objective Elder abuse, an important human rights issue and public health problem, contributes to increased disability and mortality. In the last decades, several reviews have synthesized primary studies to determine its prevalence. This umbrella review aimed to estimate the worldwide overall prevalence rate of elder abuse in the community and care setting. Methods Following prospective registration at PROSPERO (CRD42021281866) we conducted a search of eight electronic databases to identify systematic reviews from inception until 17 January 2023. The corrected covered area was calculated to estimate the potential overlap of primary studies between reviews. The quality of the selected reviews was assessed using a modified AMSTAR-2 instrument. We extracted data on the prevalence of any type of elder (people aged 60 years old or older) abuse in the community and care setting. Results There were 16 systematic reviews retrieved between 2007 and 2022, out of which ten captured prevalence globally, three in Iran, one in Turkey, one in China and one in Brazil. The 16 reviews included 136 primary studies in total between 1988 and 2020. The overlapping of studies between reviews was found to be moderate (5.5%). The quality of reviews was low (2, 12.5%) or critically low (14, 87.5%). The estimated range of global prevalence of overall elder abuse was wide (1.1–78%), while the estimations of specific abuse prevalence ranged from 0–81.8% for neglect, 1.1–78.9% for psychological abuse, 0.7–78.3% for financial abuse, 0.1–67.7% for physical abuse, and 0–59.2% for sexual abuse. Conclusions Although the low quality of the evidence and the heterogeneity of the phenomenon makes it hard to give precise prevalence data, it is without a question that elder abuse is a prevalent problem with a wide dispersion. The focus of attention should shift towards interventions and policymaking to prevent this form of abuse.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • World Health Organization. Abuse of older people. (2022) https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abuse-of-older-people
  • A.B. Van Den Bruele, M. Dimachk, M. Crandall. Elder abuse. Clin Geriatr Med, 35 (2019), pp. 103-113
  • Y. Yon, C.R. Mikton, Z.D. Gassoumis, K.H. Wilber. Elder abuse prevalence in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health, 5 (2017), pp. e147-e156
  • C. Bozzaro, J. Boldt, M. Schweda. Are older people a vulnerable group? Philosophical and bioethical perspectives on ageing and vulnerability. Bioethics, 32 (2018), pp. 233-239
  • M. Cesari, R. Calvani, E. Marzetti. Frailty in older persons. Clin Geriatr Med, 33 (2017), pp. 293-303
  • J.E. Morley, B. Vellas, G.A. van Kan, S.D. Anker, J.M. Bauer, R. Bernabei, et al. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 14 (2013), pp. 392-397
  • C. Koga, T. Tsuji, M. Hanazato, N. Suzuki, K. Kondo. Elder abuse and depressive symptoms: which is cause and effect? Bidirectional longitudinal studies from the JAGES. J Interpers Violence, 37 (2022), pp. NP9403-NP9419
  • R. Acierno, M.A. Hernandez-Tejada, G.J. Anetzberger, D. Loew, W. Muzzy. The National Elder Mistreatment Study: an 8-year longitudinal study of outcomes. J Elder Abuse Negl, 29 (2017), pp. 254-269
  • F. Rivara, A. Adhia, V. Lyons, A. Massey, B. Mills, E. Morgan, et al. The effects of violence on health. Health Aff (Millwood), 38 (2019), pp. 1622-1629
  • Dong, M.A. Simon. Elder abuse as a risk factor for hospitalization in older persons. JAMA Intern Med, 173 (2013), pp. 911-917
  • K.E. Covinsky. Hospitalization in older persons: not just a medical outcome, a social outcome as well: comment on “Elder abuse as a risk factor for hospitalization in older persons”. JAMA Intern Med, 173 (2013), p. 919
  • R.M. Yunus, N.N. Hairi, W.Y. Choo. Consequences of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review of observational studies. Trauma Violence Abuse, 20 (2019), pp. 197-213
  • M.J. Schofield, J.R. Powers, D. Loxton. Mortality and disability outcomes of self-reported elder abuse: a 12-year prospective investigation. J Am Geriatr Soc, 61 (2013), pp. 679-685
  • Y. Yon, M. Ramiro-Gonzalez, C.R. Mikton, M. Huber, D. Sethi. The prevalence of elder abuse in institutional settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health, 29 (2019), pp. 58-67
  • S.K. Lo, C.K. Lai, C.M. Tsui. Student nurses’ perception and understanding of elder abuse Int J Older People Nurs, 5 (2010), pp. 283-289
  • E. Mercier, A. Nadeau, A.A. Brousseau, M. Émond, J. Lowthian, S. Berthelot, et al. Elder abuse in the out-of-hospital and emergency department settings: a scoping review. Ann Emerg Med, 75 (2020), pp. 181-191
  • E. Aromataris, R. Fernandez, C.M. Godfrey, C. Holly, H. Khalil, P. Tungpunkom. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc, 13 (2015), pp. 132-140
  • M. Gates, A. Gates, D. Pieper, R.M. Fernandes, A.C. Tricco, D. Moher, et al. Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement. BMJ, 378 (2022), p. e070849
  • D. Pieper, L. Puljak. Language restrictions in systematic reviews should not be imposed in the search strategy but in the eligibility criteria if necessary. J Clin Epidemiol, 132 (2021), pp. 146-147
  • H. Ewald, I. Klerings, G. Wagner, T.L. Heise, J.M. Stratil, S.K. Lhachimi, et al. Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study. J Clin Epidemiol, 149 (2022), pp. 154-164
  • K.S. Khan, A. Bueno Cavanillas, J. Zamora. Systematic reviews in five steps. I. Framing questions to obtain valid answers. Semergen, 48 (2022), pp. 356-361
  • E. Commission, Eurostat. Ageing Europe: looking at the lives of older people in the EU: 2019 edition. Publications Office (2019)
  • M. Ouzzani, H. Hammady, Z. Fedorowicz, A. Elmagarmid. Rayyan – a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev, 5 (2016), p. 210
  • S. McKeown, Z.M. Mir. Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references. Syst Rev, 10 (2021), p. 38
  • J.L. Jackson, A. Kuriyama, A. Anton, A. Choi, J.P. Fournier, A.K. Geier, et al. The accuracy of google translate for abstracting data from non-English-language trials for systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med, 171 (2019), pp. 677-679
  • M. Núñez-Núñez, N. Cano-Ibáñez, J. Zamora, A. Bueno-Cavanillas, K.S. Khan. Assessing the integrity of clinical trials included in evidence syntheses. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 20 (2023), pp. 1-13
  • J. Garre-Olmo, X. Planas-Pujol, S. Lopez-Pousa, D. Juvinya, A. Vilà, J. Vilalta-Franch. Prevalence and risk factors of suspected elder abuse subtypes in people aged 75 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc, 57 (2009), pp. 815-822
  • B.J. Shea, B.C. Reeves, G. Wells, M. Thuku, C. Hamel, J. Moran, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358 (2017), p. j4008
  • R.M. Román-Gálvez, S. Martín-Peláez, J.M. Martínez-Galiano, K.S. Khan, A. Bueno-Cavanillas. Worldwide prevalence of intimate partner violence in pregnancy. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health, 9 (2021), p. 738459
  • R.M. Román-Gálvez, S. Martín-Peláez, J.M. Martínez-Galiano, K.S. Khan, A. Bueno-Cavanillas. Prevalence of intimate partner violence in pregnancy: an umbrella review. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18 (2021), pp. 1-13
  • K.I. Bougioukas, E. Vounzoulaki, C.D. Mantsiou, E.D. Savvides, C. Karakosta, T. Diakonidis, et al. Methods for depicting overlap in overviews of systematic reviews: an introduction to static tabular and graphical displays. J Clin Epidemiol, 132 (2021), pp. 34-45
  • L.P. Zhang, Y.G. Du, H.Y. Dou, J. Liu. The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect in rural areas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Geriatr Med, 13 (2022), pp. 585-596
  • M. Yalçın Gürsoy, G. Tanrıverdi. Elder abuse prevalance and related risk factors in Turkey: a systematic review. Age Int, 48 (2022), pp. 656-668
  • H. Tao, J. Jin, H. Ruan, J. Chi, X. Niu, J. Zhang, et al. The prevalence of elder abuse in China: a systematic review. Chin J Evid-Based Med, 20 (2020), pp. 938-944
  • Y. Yon, C. Mikton, Z.D. Gassoumis, K.H. Wilber. The prevalence of self-reported elder abuse among older women in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse, 20 (2019), pp. 245-259
  • Ghiasi. Prevalence of elder abuse and neglect in iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Shiraz E Med J, 19 (2018), pp. 1-11
  • M. Arab-Zozani, N. Mostafazadeh, Z. Arab-Zozani, D. Ghoddoosi- Nejad, S. Hassanipour, J.J.F. Soares. The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Elder Abuse Negl, 30 (2018), pp. 408-423
  • D. Warmling, S.R. Lindner, E.B.S. Coelho. Intimate partner violence prevalence in the elderly and associated factors: systematic review. Cien Saude Colet, 22 (2017), pp. 3111-3125
  • M. Molaei, K. Etemad, P. Taheri Tanjani. Prevalence of elder abuse in Iran: a systematic review and meta analysis. Salmand Iran J Ageing, 12 (2017), pp. 242-252
  • B. McCausland, L. Knight, L. Page, K. Trevillion. A systematic review of the prevalence and odds of domestic abuse victimization among people with dementia. Int Rev Psychiatry, 28 (2016), pp. 475-484
  • I.O. De Santana, D.C. De Vasconcelos, M.P. De Lima Coutinho. Prevalence of violence against elderly in the Brazil: analytic review. Arq Bras Psicol, 68 (2016), pp. 126-139
  • R. Sooryanarayana, W.Y. Choo, N.N. Hairi. A review on the prevalence and measurement of elder abuse in the community. Trauma Violence Abuse, 14 (2013), pp. 316-325
  • K. Hughes, M.A. Bellis, L. Jones, S. Wood, G. Bates, L. Eckley, et al. Prevalence and risk of violence against adults with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet, 379 (2012), pp. 1621-1629
  • C. Cooper, A. Selwood, G. Livingston. The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review. Age Ageing, 37 (2008), pp. 151-160
  • C.R. Espíndola, S.L. Blay. Prevalence of elder abuse: a systematic review. Rev Saude Publ, 41 (2007), pp. 301-306
  • P. Fusar-Poli, J. Radua. Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews. Evid Based Ment Health, 21 (2018), pp. 95-100
  • E. Yan, K.L. Chan, A. Tiwari. A systematic review of prevalence and risk factors for elder abuse in Asia. Trauma Violence Abuse, 16 (2015), pp. 199-219
  • N. Trabold. Screening for intimate partner violence within a health care setting: a systematic review of the literatura. Soc Work Health Care, 45 (2007), pp. 1-18
  • Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 6.4. Cochrane (2023)
  • K. Pillemer, D. Burnes, C. Riffin, M.S. Lachs. Elder abuse: global situation, risk factors, and prevention strategies. Gerontologist, 56 (Suppl. 2) (2016), pp. S194-S205
  • M.J. Yaffe, B. Tazkarji. Understanding elder abuse in family practice. Can Fam Physician, 58 (2012), pp. 1336-1340. e695-8
  • K.S. Khan. Cairo Consensus Group on Research I. International multi-stakeholder consensus statement on clinical trial integrity. BJOG, 130 (2023), pp. 1096-1111
  • E.M. Forsberg, F.O. Anthun, S. Bailey, G. Birchley, H. Bout, C. Casonato, et al. Working with research integrity-guidance for research performing organisations: the Bonn PRINTEGER Statement. Sci Eng Ethics, 24 (2018), pp. 1023-1034
  • D. Moher, L. Bouter, S. Kleinert, P. Glasziou, M.H. Sham, V. Barbour, et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: fostering research integrity. PLoS Biol, 18 (2020), p. e3000737
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet