Publicaciones en las que colabora con ROSA MARÍA RODRÍGUEZ SÁNCHEZ (90)

2024

  1. What is the sensitivity and specificity of the peer review process?

    Accountability in Research, Vol. 31, Núm. 4, pp. 305-326

2023

  1. How to motivate a reviewer with a present bias to work harder

    Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 17, Núm. 4

2022

  1. A formal study of co-opetition in scholarly publishing

    Journal of Information Science

  2. Can a paid model for peer review be sustainable when the author can decide whether to pay or not?

    Scientometrics, Vol. 127, Núm. 3, pp. 1491-1514

  3. Fraud, specialization, and efficiency in peer review

    Research Evaluation, Vol. 31, Núm. 1, pp. 15-23

  4. The cross-subsidy and buy-one-give-one models of compensated peer review: A comparative study for mission-driven journals

    Journal of Information Science

2021

  1. Quality censoring in peer review

    Scientometrics

  2. The editor-manuscript game

    Scientometrics, Vol. 126, Núm. 5, pp. 4277-4295

  3. The interplay between the reviewer’s incentives and the journal’s quality standard

    Scientometrics, Vol. 126, Núm. 4, pp. 3041-3061

2020

  1. Confirmatory bias in peer review

    Scientometrics, Vol. 123, Núm. 1, pp. 517-533

  2. The author–reviewer game

    Scientometrics, Vol. 124, Núm. 3, pp. 2409-2431

2019

  1. An evolutionary explanation of assassins and zealots in peer review

    Scientometrics, Vol. 120, Núm. 3, pp. 1373-1385

  2. Do the best papers have the highest probability of being cited?

    Scientometrics, Vol. 118, Núm. 3, pp. 885-890

  3. The Game Between a Biased Reviewer and His Editor

    Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 25, Núm. 1, pp. 265-283

  4. The author’s ignorance on the publication fees is a source of power for publishers

    Scientometrics, Vol. 121, Núm. 3, pp. 1435-1445

  5. The optimal amount of information to provide in an academic manuscript

    Scientometrics, Vol. 121, Núm. 3, pp. 1685-1705

2018

  1. Competition between academic journals for scholars’ attention: the ‘Nature effect’ in scholarly communication

    Scientometrics, Vol. 115, Núm. 3, pp. 1413-1432

  2. Editorial decisions with informed and uninformed reviewers

    Scientometrics, Vol. 117, Núm. 1, pp. 25-43

2017

  1. Problems with open participation in peer review

    Scientometrics

  2. STRATEGY: a tool for the formulation of peer-review strategies

    Scientometrics, Vol. 113, Núm. 1, pp. 45-60