Argitalpenak (173) JOSÉ ANTONIO GARCÍA SORIA argitalpenak Ikerketa datu erreferentziatuak ikusi.

2024

  1. A formal study of co-opetition in scholarly publishing

    Journal of Information Science, Vol. 50, Núm. 5, pp. 1211-1222

  2. What is the sensitivity and specificity of the peer review process?

    Accountability in Research, Vol. 31, Núm. 4, pp. 305-326

2023

  1. How to motivate a reviewer with a present bias to work harder

    Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 17, Núm. 4

2022

  1. Can a paid model for peer review be sustainable when the author can decide whether to pay or not?

    Scientometrics, Vol. 127, Núm. 3, pp. 1491-1514

  2. Fraud, specialization, and efficiency in peer review

    Research Evaluation, Vol. 31, Núm. 1, pp. 15-23

  3. The cross-subsidy and buy-one-give-one models of compensated peer review: A comparative study for mission-driven journals

    Journal of Information Science

2021

  1. Quality censoring in peer review

    Scientometrics

  2. The editor-manuscript game

    Scientometrics, Vol. 126, Núm. 5, pp. 4277-4295

  3. The interplay between the reviewer’s incentives and the journal’s quality standard

    Scientometrics, Vol. 126, Núm. 4, pp. 3041-3061

2020

  1. Accommodation and pupil dynamics as potential objective predictors of behavioural performance in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Vision Research, Vol. 175, pp. 32-40

  2. Children with Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Show an Altered Eye Movement Pattern during Reading

    Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, Vol. 97, Núm. 4, pp. 265-274

  3. Confirmatory bias in peer review

    Scientometrics, Vol. 123, Núm. 1, pp. 517-533

  4. The author–reviewer game

    Scientometrics, Vol. 124, Núm. 3, pp. 2409-2431

  5. Visual function, performance, and processing of basketball players vs. sedentary individuals

    Journal of Sport and Health Science, Vol. 9, Núm. 6, pp. 587-594

  6. Wearing Swimming Goggles Reduces Central Corneal Thickness and Anterior Chamber Angle, and Increases Intraocular Pressure

    Current Eye Research, Vol. 45, Núm. 5, pp. 535-541

2019

  1. An evolutionary explanation of assassins and zealots in peer review

    Scientometrics, Vol. 120, Núm. 3, pp. 1373-1385

  2. Do the best papers have the highest probability of being cited?

    Scientometrics, Vol. 118, Núm. 3, pp. 885-890

  3. The Game Between a Biased Reviewer and His Editor

    Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 25, Núm. 1, pp. 265-283

  4. The author’s ignorance on the publication fees is a source of power for publishers

    Scientometrics, Vol. 121, Núm. 3, pp. 1435-1445

  5. The optimal amount of information to provide in an academic manuscript

    Scientometrics, Vol. 121, Núm. 3, pp. 1685-1705