Publicaciones (100) Publicaciones de ROSA MARÍA RODRÍGUEZ SÁNCHEZ

2024

  1. What is the sensitivity and specificity of the peer review process?

    Accountability in Research, Vol. 31, Núm. 4, pp. 305-326

2023

  1. Attention–Survival Score: A Metric to Choose Better Keywords and Improve Visibility of Information

    Algorithms, Vol. 16, Núm. 4

  2. How to motivate a reviewer with a present bias to work harder

    Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 17, Núm. 4

  3. The relevance of title, abstract, and keywords for scientific paper quality and potential impact

    Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 82, Núm. 15, pp. 23075-23090

2022

  1. A formal study of co-opetition in scholarly publishing

    Journal of Information Science

  2. Can a paid model for peer review be sustainable when the author can decide whether to pay or not?

    Scientometrics, Vol. 127, Núm. 3, pp. 1491-1514

  3. Corner Centrality of Nodes in Multilayer Networks: A Case Study in the Network Analysis of Keywords

    Algorithms, Vol. 15, Núm. 10

  4. Finding answers to COVID-19-specific questions: An information retrieval system based on latent keywords and adapted TF-IDF

    Journal of Information Science

  5. Fraud, specialization, and efficiency in peer review

    Research Evaluation, Vol. 31, Núm. 1, pp. 15-23

  6. The cross-subsidy and buy-one-give-one models of compensated peer review: A comparative study for mission-driven journals

    Journal of Information Science

2021

  1. Quality censoring in peer review

    Scientometrics

  2. The editor-manuscript game

    Scientometrics, Vol. 126, Núm. 5, pp. 4277-4295

  3. The interplay between the reviewer’s incentives and the journal’s quality standard

    Scientometrics, Vol. 126, Núm. 4, pp. 3041-3061

2020

  1. Confirmatory bias in peer review

    Scientometrics, Vol. 123, Núm. 1, pp. 517-533

  2. Text Categorisation through Dimensionality Reduction Using Wavelet Transform

    Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, Vol. 19, Núm. 4

  3. The author–reviewer game

    Scientometrics, Vol. 124, Núm. 3, pp. 2409-2431

2019

  1. An evolutionary explanation of assassins and zealots in peer review

    Scientometrics, Vol. 120, Núm. 3, pp. 1373-1385

  2. Do the best papers have the highest probability of being cited?

    Scientometrics, Vol. 118, Núm. 3, pp. 885-890

  3. The Game Between a Biased Reviewer and His Editor

    Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 25, Núm. 1, pp. 265-283

  4. The author’s ignorance on the publication fees is a source of power for publishers

    Scientometrics, Vol. 121, Núm. 3, pp. 1435-1445