La presentación de las tareas en función de la formación académica de los entrenadores de fútbol

  1. Mesquita Riveiro, Isabel
  2. Farias, C.
  3. Rosado, António
  4. Pereira, F.
  5. Moreno Arroyo, María Perla
Revue:
European Journal of Human Movement

ISSN: 0214-0071,  2386-4095

Année de publication: 2008

Número: 20

Pages: 128-143

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: European Journal of Human Movement

Résumé

The purpose of the present study was to characterize the pedagogical interventions of the football coaches during the task presentations, based on the coaches' specialized academic degree. The sample consisted of twelve football coaches (n=12). The dependent variables were as follows: the tasks' type nature (analyzed by Rink's system categories, 1993); the task explicitness level (analyzed by Silverman, Kullina y Crull's system categories, 1995). The independent variables of the study were the specialized academic degrees, differentiating between those with a graduation in physical education and those without. The results show that coaches predominantly present information tasks and the refinement, extension and application tasks were rarely used, which suggests a bad didactic development of the content. As to the task explicitness level, the majority of coaches' instructions are given through general instruction, which privileged clarifying the task outcome and situation tasks and some information about criteria-form and the outcome. The coaches with a graduation in physical education use more refinement tasks and task explicitness, and refer significantly more to criteria-form than coaches with no graduation.

Références bibliographiques

  • BLOOM, G. A., CRUMPTON, R., Y ANDERSON, J. E. (1999). A systematic observation study of the teaching behaviours of an expert basketball coach. The Sport Psychologist, 13, 157-170.
  • CHAUMETON, M. R., Y DUDA, J. L. (1988). Is it how you play the game of whether you win or lose? The effect of competitive level and situation on coaching behaviours. Journal of Sport Behaviour, 11, 157-174.
  • CLAXTON, A. (1988). Systematic observation of more and less successful high school tennis coaches. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 7, 302-310.
  • CUSHION, C. J., Y JONES, R. L. (2001). A Systematic Observation of Professional Top-Level Youth Soccer Coaches. Journal of Sport Behaviour, 24 (4), 354-378.
  • DOYLE, W. (1983). Academic Work. Review of Education Research, 53 (2), 159-199.
  • DOYLE, W. (1986). Paradigmes de Recherche sur L’Efficacité des Enseignants. In M. Crahay y D. Lafontaine (Eds.). L’art et la science de l’enseignement (pp. 435-481). Bruxells: Editions Labor.
  • GARGANTA, J. (2007). Relatório da disciplina de Metodologia I, Opção de Futebol. Porto: J. Garganta. Documento apresentado para a realização das provas de agregação em Ciência do Desporto na Faculdade de Desporto, Universidade do Porto.
  • GRAHAM, G., Y HEIMERER, E. (1981). Research on Teacher Effectiveness: A Summary with Implications for Teaching. Quest, 33 (1), 14-25.
  • GROSSMAN, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teacher College Press.
  • GUSTHART, J., KELLY, I., Y RINK, J. (1997). The Validity of the Qualitative Measure of Teaching Performance Scale as a Measure of Teacher Effectiveness. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16 (2), 196-210.
  • GUSTHART, J., Y SPRINGINGS, E. (1989). Student Learning as a Measure of Teacher Effectiveness in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 8 (4), 298-311.
  • HASTIE, P. (1995). An Ecology of a Secondary School Outdoor Adventure Camp. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 79-97.
  • HASTIE, P. (1999). An Instrument for Recording Coaches´ comments and Instructions During Time-outs. Journal of Sport Behaviour, 22 (4), 467-478.
  • HASTIE, P., Y SAUNDERS, J. (1992). A Study of Task Systems and Accountability in an Elite Junior Sports Setting. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 11, 376-388.
  • HASTIE, P., Y VLAISAVLJEVIC, N. (1999). The Relationship Between Subject-Matter Expertise and Accountability in Instructional Tasks. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19, 22-23.
  • HERBERT, E., LANDIN D., Y SOLMON, M. (2000). The Impact of Task Progressions on Students’ Practice, Quality and Task-Related Thoughts. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19, 338-354.
  • HORTON, S., BAKER, J., Y DEAKIN, J. (2005). Expert in action: a systematic observation of 5 national team coaches. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36, 299-319.
La source de données: Dialnet