Caracterización histológica en uretroplastias experimentales de mucosa oral

  1. Martín Cano, F.
  2. Marañés Gálvez, C.
  3. Liceras Liceras, E.
  4. García Gómez, M.
  5. Díaz Moreno, E.
  6. Ruiz Montes, A. M.
  7. Garzón Bello, Ingrid
  8. Fernández Valadés, Ricardo
Revista:
Actualidad médica

ISSN: 0365-7965

Año de publicación: 2010

Tomo: 95

Número: 781

Páginas: 5-9

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGIBUG editor

Otras publicaciones en: Actualidad médica

Resumen

Introduction: Several surgical techniques have been used for urethral reconstruction. In this context, oral mucosa grafts are currently required. The aim of this study was to analyze the structural and ultraestructural modifications of grafted tissues exposed to different environmental conditions. Material and methods: 20 male Wistar rats under general anesthesia were used. Control group was set, and groups of study were set, and underwent an urethroplasty with oral mucosa graft analyzed at 7, 14 and 30 days. Results: The technique used was feasible. The analysis in oral grafted tissues showed an adequate integration level, with a shrinking interphase formation between the oral and urethral mucosa. At 30 days, the integration was completed and the oral mucosa showed 5-6 flat cell layers, with a similar structure to the urethral epithelium. Conclusions: The oral mucosa used as heterologous graft was able to differentiate in an adequate way to generate a structurally similar tissue to the native urethra.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ahmed Sand Guugh, D., Buccal mucosal graft for secundary hypospadias repair and urethral replacement. 1997. 80(2): p. 328-330.
  • Baird, A.D., R.I. Mathews, and J.P. Gearhart, The use of combined bladder and epispadias repair in boys with classic bladder exstrophy: outcomes, complications and consequences. J Urol, 2005. 174(4 Pt 1): p. 1421-4.
  • Belman AB, E.-K.A., Noweir AM, El-Halaby MR, Zakaria W, El-Beialy MH, The use of buccal mucosa patch graft in the management of anterior urethral structures. J Urol 1993. 149: p. 276-278.
  • Castañón M., G.C., Muñoz ME., García A., Morales L., Tratamiento de los hipospadias escrotales graves mediante uretroplastia tipo onlay con mucosa oral. Cir Pediatr 1999. 12: p. 90-93.
  • Dessanti, A., et al., Autologous buccal mucosa graft for hypospadias repair: an initial report. J Urol, 1992. 147(4): p. 1081-3; discussion 1083-4.
  • Dessanti, A., et al., Labial mucosa and combined labial/bladder mucosa free graft for urethral reconstruction. J Pediatr Surg, 1995. 30(11): p. 1554-6.
  • Filipas, D., et al., The histology and immunohistochemistry of free buccal mucosa and full-skin grafts after exposure to urine. BJU Int, 1999. 84(1): p. 108-11.
  • Ito, R., M. Fujiwara, and R. Nagasako, Hard palate mucoperiosteal graft for posterior lamellar reconstruction of the upper eyelid: histologic rationale. J Craniofac Surg, 2007. 18(3): p. 684-90.
  • Markiewicz, M.R., et al., Morbidity associated with oral mucosa harvest for urological reconstruction: an overview. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008. 66(4): p. 739-44.
  • Michael H. Ross, W.P., Aparato urinario, in Histologia. Texto y Atlas color con Biología Celular y Molecular M. Panamericana, Editor. 2004. p. 724-725.
  • Nahas, B.W. and W.B. Nahas, The use of a buccal mucosa patch graft in the management of a large urethrocutaneous fistula. Br J Urol, 1994. 74(5): p. 679-81.
  • Persichetti, P., et al., Triple intercalated flaps in perineal urethral replacement: an efficient technique to prevent circumferential urethral stenosis. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2006. 117(2): p. 708-10.
  • Xu, Y.M., et al., Histopathological changes of free buccal mucosa and colonic mucosa grafts after translation to dog bladder. Chin Med J (Engl), 2005. 118(4): p. 337-9.
  • Xu, Y.M., et al., Oral mucosal grafts urethroplasty for the treatment of long segmented anterior urethral strictures. World J Urol, 2009.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet