Artrodesis de tobilloresultados comparativos de diferentes técnicas
- Prados Olleta, Nicolás 1
- Galadí Fernández, Marisa 1
- Plais Cotrel, Nicolás 1
- Pérez Romero, Dolores del Mar 1
- Álvarez Osuna, Rosa María 1
- Tercedor Sánchez, Juan 1
- 1 Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves. Granada
ISSN: 1578-9756
Año de publicación: 2012
Volumen: 29
Número: 2
Páginas: 164-173
Tipo: Artículo
Otras publicaciones en: Revista de la Sociedad Andaluza de Traumatología y Ortopedia
Resumen
INTRODUCTION: Ankle arthrodesis in an intervention that may be performed using a variety of surgical approaches. The joint may be stabilized using dffierent systems, with or without bone graft. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study that collected the results of 40 patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis; the complications that arose were analyzed, results according to the AOFAS clinical rating system, global patient satisfaction and the relationship with the articular approach route, the fixation system or the usage of grafts. RESULTS: 55% of the patients presented one or more complication that motivated a total of 12 re-interventions in 10 patients (excludes removal of osteosynthesis material). The absence of consolidation, which required a new arthrodesis was more frequent in patients where osteosynthesis was not used (two out of three cases) than in those using screws (four out of 24 cases), while there was no register of this in 13 patients in which intramedullary pin. The use of the distal extreme of the fibula or the iliac crest as bone graft has failed to improve the consolidation. Arthroscopic approaches avoid the appearance of soft tissue complications, although the consolidation disorders were more frequent. The average score on the AOFAS clinical rating system was 56.4±21.2 and 55% of the patients were satis!ed. CONCLUSIONS: Although the case histories fail to provide significant results, it is a demanding intervention, with an elevated complication rate. Intramedullary pins seem to favor improved consolidation.