Retos de la profesionalización docente en educación superior

  1. Álvarez Ferrándiz, Daniel 1
  2. Avalos García, Inmaculada 2
  3. Cuevas López, Mercedes 2
  4. Fernández Cruz, Manuel 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Granad
  2. 2 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Aldizkaria:
International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

ISSN: 0214-9877

Argitalpen urtea: 2022

Zenbakien izenburua: El mundo al Encuentro. Una reflexión sobre la Educación

Alea: 1

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 513-518

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.17060/IJODAEP.2022.N1.V1.2409 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

Laburpena

Phenomena such as the growth or massification and democratization of access to higher education are at the basis of the new role that universities playin developed societies. In this new function, the university definitively ceasesto havea monopoly on research and the academic body ceases to pivot in a balanced way between the traditional functions of research and teaching (gher & Savage, 2020), to fragment into different ways of exercising the profession with different weights for the various functions. Both the loss of the monopoly of research and the need for alliances with the productive sector, as well as the transformation in the vision of the training of professionals (Bourke, 2019), the rise of privatization and theemergence of new institutional formats of Higher Education, have generated the need to increase the processes of accountability to society (Latif et al, 2019) and, therefore, to implement accreditation and evaluation mechanisms based on standards. In this paper we will analyze three of the logics that have been linked to institutional evaluation: accountability, compliance with requirements and improvement. Through these logics, a culture of quality is externally imposed in universities that tends towards excellence and moves internal processes (Pulido, 2005): (a) of resistance or bureaucratization; (b) of adjustment and implementation; (c) or of appropriation and improvement. It is in this third case, in which the teaching action is modeled, strengthening the emergence of novel professional features and functions. All this occurs in a non-uniform manner depending on the nature of each institution concerned and on the stage of professional development of the teacher, his or her expectations, training, and the life cycle of each teacher.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Bahr, N., & Mellor, S. (2016). Building quality in teaching and teacher education.
  • Bourke, T. (2019). The changing face of accreditation for initial teacher education programmes in Australia. In Professionalism and teacher education (27-45). Springer, Singapore.
  • Bucherberger, F., Campos, B. P., Kallos, D., & Stephenson, J. (2000). Green paper on teacher education in Europe: High quality teacher education for high quality education and training.
  • Caena, F. (2014). Initial teacher education in Europe: an overview of policy issues. European Commission. ET2020 Working Group of Schools Policy.
  • Cameron, M., & Baker, R. (2004). Research on initial teacher education in New Zealand. Council for Education Research Annual Report. Government Printer, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Chong, S., & Ho, P. (2009). Quality teaching and learning: a quality assurance framework for initial teacher preparation programmes. International journal of management in education, 3 (3-4), 302-314.
  • Gallagher, S. E., & Savage, T. (2020). Challenge-based learning in higher education: an exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education, 1-23.
  • Hammerness, K., & Klette, K. (2015). Indicators of qualityin teachereducation: Looking at features of teachereducation from an international perspective. In Promoting and sustaining a quality teacher workforce. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Klette, K., & Hammerness, K. (2016). Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Qualities in Teacher Education: Looking at Features of Teacher Education from an International Perspective. Acta Didactica Norge, 10 (2), 26–52.
  • Latif, K. F., Latif, I., Farooq Sahibzada, U., & Ullah, M. (2019). In search of quality: measuring higher education service quality (HiEduQual). Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30 (7-8), 768-791.
  • Moir, E., & Gless, J. (2001). Quality induction: An investment in teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 109-114.
  • Whatman, J., & MacDonald, J. (2017). High quality practica and the integration of theory and practice in initial teacher education. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet