Las prácticas formativas en Ciencias Socialesuna comparación entre el Trabajo Social y la Sociología

  1. Manzanera Ruíz, Roser 1
  2. Medina Rodríguez, María del Valle 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Journal:
Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives. REALIA

ISSN: 2659-9031

Year of publication: 2022

Issue: 29

Pages: 27-42

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7203/REALIA.29.23735 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives. REALIA

Abstract

Professional practice in Social Work is not new. In southern Spain, for example, such practice dates back to the 1960s. In 2010, studies in this discipline were incorporated into the university education system. This article has three main objectives: (1) to determine which skills students of social work and sociology acquire when taking part in practical and professional courses; (2) to investigate how formative practice contributes to critical professional practice in both these dis- ciplines and how it impacts problem solving in social work; and (3) to identify the strengths and weaknesses of professional practice in social work and analyse their causes and consequences. To achieve these objectives we used a qualitative methodology in which we analysed secondary sour- ces and conducted semi-structured interviews with participants involved in formative practices on each degree. Our results show that the Bologna Plan has strengthened knowledge areas such as so- cial work more than others with greater academic traditions (such as Sociology) by expanding their training practices, providing greater critical perspectives, and promoting better integration between theory and practice. Weaknesses are also observed, however. These include an insufficient number of teaching centres and a disconnection between supervision groups that has led to differences in the training students receive.

Bibliographic References

  • Caspersen, J., y Smeby, J. C. (2021). Placement training and learning outcomes in social work education. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2650–2663. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03075079.2020.1750583
  • Cruz, A. (2011). ¿Qué se enseña y se aprende en una práctica de entrenamiento profesional en trabajo social? Prospectiva: Revista de Trabajo Social e Intervención Social, 16, 161– 196. https://doi.org/10.25100/prts.v0i16.1167
  • Ferguson, I., y Woodward, R. (2009). Radical Social Work in Practice: Making a Difference. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
  • Fook, J. (2002). Social Work: Critical Theory and Practice. London: Sage.
  • Fook, J. (2003). Critical Social Work: The Current Issues Editorial. Qualitative Social Work Research and Practice, 2(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325003002002001
  • Healy, K. (2000). Social Work Practices: Contemporary Perspectives on Change. New York: Sage.
  • Heggen, K., Smeby, J. C., y Vågan, A. (2015). Coherence - A Longitudinal Approach. En J. C. Smeby y M. Sutphen (Eds.), From Vocational to Professional Education. Educating for Social Welfare (pp. 70–88). London: Routledge.
  • Heron, B. (2005). Self-reflection in critical social work practice: Subjectivity and the possibilities of resistance. Reflective Practice, 6(3), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14623940500220095
  • Heron, B. (2007). Desire for development: Whiteness, gender, and the helping imperative. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier Press.
  • Irvine, J., Molyneux, J., y Gillman, M. (2015). Providing a Link with the Real World: Learning from the Student Experience of Service User and Carer Involvement in Social Work Education. Social Work Education, 34(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.957178
  • Kondrat, M. E. (1999). Who Is the “Self” in Self-Aware: Professional Self Awareness from a Critical Theory Perspective. Social Service Review, 73(4), 451–477. https://doi.org/ 10.1086/514441
  • Riquelme, S. F. (2010). Prácticas y profesión en Trabajo Social: relaciones académicas y proceso metodológico. Cuadernos De Trabajo Social, 23, 229–246. Descargado de https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CUTS/article/view/CUTS1010110229A
  • Rossiter, A. (2001). Innocence lost and suspicion found: Do we educate for or against social work? Critical Social Work, 2(1), 1–5.
  • Ruiz, R. M., y Sánchez, I. M. (2017). Professional competencies in social work education for the third sector in southern Spain. Social Work Education, 37 (1), 92–107. https:// doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1378317
  • Tonon, G., Robles, C., y Meza, M. (2004). La supervisión en el trabajo social. Una cuestión profesional y académica. Buenos Aires: Espacio.