Uso de eSalud para promover la actividad física en los supervivientes de neoplasias torácicas: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis

  1. Janet Rodríguez-Torres 1
  2. Calvache Mateo, Andrés 1
  3. Araceli Ortiz-Rubio 1
  4. Natalia Muñoz-Vigueras 1
  5. Laura López-López 1
  6. Marie C. Valenza 1
  1. 1 Departamento de Fisioterapia, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España
Revista:
Enfermería clínica

ISSN: 1130-8621

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 33

Número: 2

Páginas: 123-136

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.ENFCLI.2022.10.005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Enfermería clínica

Resumen

Antecedentes Las tasas de supervivencia para muchas formas de neoplasias torácicas han mejorado durante las últimas décadas. Sin embargo, muchos supervivientes tienen que hacer frente a los efectos secundarios del tratamiento del cáncer durante un tiempo prolongado. La actividad física (AF) ha sido propuesta como estrategia terapéutica para combatir los efectos del tratamiento del cáncer, pudiendo ser eSalud una buena manera de animar a los pacientes a practicarla. Objetivo Explorar los efectos de eSalud en la promoción de la AF entre las neoplasias torácicas. Métodos Se realizó una búsqueda de los artículos adecuados utilizando las bases de datos de PubMed, Web of Science y Scopus, mediante una combinación de títulos de temas médicos. Resultados Se identificaron 4.781 artículos en total, de los cuales 10 cumplieron los criterios de elegibilidad. Se describieron diferentes intervenciones de eSalud en estos estudios: aplicación para móviles (app) (n = 3), sitio web (n = 2), correo electrónico (n = 2), aplicación para web y móvil (n = 1), asesoramiento telefónico (n = 1) y página online (n = 1). Todos los estudios reportaron mejoras en cuanto a AF y 8/10 estudios reportaron cambios estadísticamente significativos. Conclusión Nuestros resultados muestran que los programas de eSalud son útiles para promover la AF en los supervivientes de neoplasias torácicas, en comparación con la no intervención, el tratamiento convencional o el enfoque dietético. Además, este metaanálisis reveló también que eSalud es un buen modo de mejorar el nivel de AF en los supervivientes de neoplasias torácicas.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • A. Sharma, P. Fidias, L.A. Hayman, S.L. Loomis, K.H. Taber, S.L. Aquino Patterns of lymphadenopathy in thoracic malignancies Radiographics., 24 (2004), pp. 419-434
  • F. Bray, J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R.L. Siegel, L.A. Torre, A. Jemal Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries CA Cancer J Clin., 68 (2018), pp. 394-424
  • H. Hoy, T. Lynch, M. Beck Surgical Treatment of Lung Cancer Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am., 31 (2019), pp. 303-313
  • R. Templeton, D. Greenhalgh Preoperative rehabilitation for thoracic surgery Curr Opin Anaesthesiol., 32 (2019), pp. 23-28
  • M. Semik, C. Schmid, F. Trosch, P. Broermann, H.H. Scheld Lung cancer surgery—preoperative risk assessment and patient selection Lung Cancer., 33 (Suppl 1) (2001), pp. S9-S15
  • K.S. Courneya, C.M. Freidenreich Framework PEACE: an organizational model for examining physical exercise across the cancer experience Ann Behav Med., 23 (2001), pp. 263-272
  • C. Haberlin, T. O’Dwyer, D. Mockler, J. Moran, D.M. O’Donnell, J. Broderick The use of eHealth to promote physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review Support Care Cancer., 26 (2018), pp. 3323-3336
  • K.H. Schmitz, J. Holtzman, K.S. Courneya, L.C. Mâsse, S. Duval, R. Kane Controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev., 14 (2005), pp. 1588-1595
  • D.Y. Fong, J.W. Ho, B.P. Hui, A.M. Lee, D.J. Macfarlane, S.S. Leung, et al. Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials BMJ., 344 (2012), p. e70
  • E.A. Szymlek-Gay, R. Richards, R. Egan Physical activity among cancer survivors: a literature review N Z Med J., 124 (2011), pp. 77-89
  • L.W. Jones, N.D. Eves, M. Haykowsky, S.J. Freedland, J.R. Mackey Exercise intolerance in cancer and the role of exercise therapy to reverse dysfunction Lancet Oncol., 10 (2009), pp. 598-605
  • S. Karami, F. Asadi, H. Emami Thematic categorization of mobile health software packages and their priority from the perspective of Iranian physicians J Health Biomed Inf., 4 (2017), pp. 216-221
  • C. Free, G. Phillips, L. Galli, L. Watson, L. Felix, P. Edwards, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review PLoS Med., 10 (2013), p. e1001362
  • P. Krebs, J.O. Prochaska, J.S. Rossi A meta-analysis of computertailored interventions for health behavior change Prev Med., 51 (3–4) (2010), pp. 214-221
  • C.A. Davies, J.C. Spence, C. Vandelanotte, C.M. Caperchione, W.K. Mummery Meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels Int J Behavioral Nutrition Physical Activity., 9 (2012), p. 52
  • J. Bayly, D. Wakefield, N. Hepgul, A. Wilcock, I.J. Higginson, M. Maddocks Changing health behaviour with rehabilitation in thoracic cancer: A systematic review and synthesis Psychooncology., 27 (2018), pp. 1675-1694
  • H. Iihara, C. Hirose, N. Funaguchi, J. Endo, F. Ito, K. Yanase, et al. Evaluation of clinical pharmacist interventions for adverse events in hospitalized patients with thoracic cancer receiving cancer chemotherapy Mol Clin Oncol., 14 (2021), p. 116
  • D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman, Prisma Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement PLoS Med., 6 (2009), p. e1000097
  • S.H. Downs, N. Black The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions J Epidemiol Community Health., 52 (1998), pp. 377-384
  • J.J. Deeks, J. Dinnes, R. D’Amico, A.J. Sowden, C. Sakarovitch, F. Song, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies Health Technol Assess., 7 (2003), pp. 1-173
  • J. Savović, L. Weeks, J.A. Sterne, L. Turner, D.G. Altman, D. Moher, et al. Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation Syst Rev., 3 (2014), p. 37
  • J.P. Higgins, S.G. Thompson Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis Stat Med., 21 (2002), pp. 1539-1558
  • I.M. Kanera, R.A. Willems, C.A. Bolman, I. Mesters, P. Verboon, L. Lechner Long-term effects of a web-based cancer aftercare intervention on moderate physical activity and vegetable consumption among early cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act., 14 (2017), p. 19
  • J. Cairo, L. Williams, L. Bray, K. Goetzke, A.C. Perez Evaluation of a mobile health intervention to improve wellness outcomes for breast cancer survivors J Patient Cent Res Rev., 7 (2020), p. 313
  • R.J. Paxton, R. Hajek, P. Newcomb, M. Dobhal, S. Borra, W.C. Taylor, et al. A Lifestyle Intervention via email in minority breast cancer survivors: randomized parallel-group feasibility study JMIR Cancer., 3 (2017), p. e13
  • M. Allicock, D. Kendzor, A. Sedory, K.P. Gabriel, M.D. Swartz, P. Thomas, et al. A Pilot and Feasibility Mobile Health Intervention to Support Healthy Behaviors in African American Breast Cancer Survivors J Racial Ethn Health Disparities., 8 (2021), pp. 157-165
  • S.H. Kim, M.S. Shin, E.S. Lee, et al. Randomized pilot test of a simultaneous stage-matched exercise and diet intervention for breast cancer survivors Oncol Nurs Forum., 38 (2011), p. E97
  • A. Hatchett, J.S. Hallam, M.A. Ford Evaluation of a social cognitive theory-based email intervention designed to influence the physical activity of survivors of breast cancer Psychooncology., 22 (2013), pp. 829-836
  • K.E. Uhm, J.S. Yoo, S.H. Chung, J.D. Lee, I. Lee, J.I. Kim, et al. Effects of exercise intervention in breast cancer patients: is mobile health (mHealth) with pedometer more effective than conventional program using brochure? Breast Cancer Res Treat., 161 (2017), pp. 443-452
  • J. Chapman, C. Fletcher, I. Flight, C. Wilson Pilot randomized trial of a volitional help sheet-based tool to increase leisure time physical activity in breast cancer survivors Br J Health Psychol., 23 (2018), pp. 723-740
  • S.J. Hartman, S.H. Nelson, L.S. Weiner Patterns of Fitbit use and activity levels throughout a physical activity intervention: exploratory analysis from a randomized controlled trial JMIR Mhealth Uhealth., 6 (2018), p. e29
  • W. Kuijpers, W.G. Groen, H.S. Oldenburg, M.W. Wouters, N.K. Aaronson, W.H. van Harten eHealth for breast cancer survivors: use, feasibility and impact of an interactive portal JMIR Cancer., 2 (2016), p. e5456
  • S. Dorri, F. Asadi, A. Olfatbakhsh, A. Kazemi A Systematic Review of Electronic Health (eHealth) interventions to improve physical activity in patients with breast cancer Breast Cancer., 27 (2020), pp. 25-46
  • C.M. Friedenreich, C.R. Stone, W.Y. Cheung, S.C. Hayes Physical activity and mortality in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis JNCI Cancer Spectr., 4 (2020), p. pkz080
  • A. Seiler, V. Klaas, G. Tröster, C.P. Fagundes eHealth and mHealth interventions in the treatment of fatigued cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis Psychooncology., 26 (2017), pp. 1239-1253
  • R.J. van Kalsbeek, H.J. van der Pal, L. Hjorth, J.F. Winther, G. Michel, R. Haupt, et al. The European multistakeholder PanCareFollowUp project: novel, person-centred survivorship care to improve care quality, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and accessibility for cancer survivors and caregivers Eur J Cancer., 153 (2021), pp. 74-85
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet