Implementación de los dispositivos móviles en educación superiorcasos de buenas prácticas docentes

  1. José María Romero Rodríguez 1
  2. Lucia Pombo 2
  3. José Antonio Martínez Domingo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Universidad de Aveiro, Portugal
Revista:
EDMETIC

ISSN: 2254-0059

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 12

Número: 1

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.21071/EDMETIC.V12I1.15184 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: EDMETIC

Resumen

Los dispositivos móviles han adquirido un gran protagonismo en la educación en los últimos años. Además, su uso se ha intensificado a raíz de la pandemia por Covid-19. En este sentido, ante la multitud de experiencias educativas cabe discernir entre un buen uso del dispositivo móvil para llevar a cabo la práctica docente. El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar estrategias de aprendizaje con dispositivos móviles para contar con modelos de buenas prácticas docentes. Para ello, se aplicó un diseño de estudio transversal a partir de la distribución de una encuesta en línea que incluyó una escala estandarizada y un cuestionario abierto. En el estudio participaron un total de 14 profesores, con edades comprendidas entre los 28 y 64 años (M = 48,42; DT = 10,67). Los resultados obtenidos muestran que los factores sociodemográficos no influyeron en el desarrollo de buenas prácticas docentes con dispositivos móviles. Por su parte, solo cinco docentes se identificaron como agentes de buenas prácticas docentes y fue recopilada la experiencia llevada a cabo en el aula. Finalmente, las buenas prácticas docentes son un tema de interés para contar con modelos prácticos que sirvan de referencia a otros docentes y puedan implementarse en la Universidad.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alonso-García, S., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M. P., Trujillo-Torres, J. M., & RomeroRodríguez, J. M. (2019). Systematic Review of Good Teaching Practices with ICT in Spanish Higher Education. Trends and Challenges for Sustainability. Sustainability, 11(24), 7150. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247150
  • Alowayr, A. (2022). Determinants of mobile learning adoption: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 39(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-05-2021-0070
  • Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2022). Students’ Perceptions of the Actual Use of Mobile Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic in Higher Education. Sustainability, 14(3), 1125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031125
  • Aznar-Díaz, I., Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Cáceres-Reche, M. P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M. (2020). Analysis of the determining factors of good teaching practices of mobile learning at the Spanish University. An explanatory model. Computers & Education, 159, 104007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104007
  • Aznar-Díaz, I., Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., Ramos, M., & Gómez-García, G. (2021). Analysis of good teaching practices with mobile devices at the University: design and validation of the APMU scale. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 16(1) 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2021.3052482
  • Bunyakul, N., Wiwatwattana, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2022). Effects of a mobile game on students' learning achievements and motivations in a clinical chemistry course: learning style differences. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 16(2), 221-244. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2022.121886
  • Cabero-Almenara, J., Barroso-Osuna, J., Llorente-Cejudo, M. C., & Fernández, M. M. (2019). Educational Uses of Augmented Reality (AR): Experiences in Educational Science. Sustainability, 11, 4990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184990
  • Carrión, E., & Colmenero, M. J. R. (2022). Gamification and mobile learning: innovative experiences to motivate and optimise music content within university contexts. Music Education Research, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2022.2042500
  • Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007
  • Dafonte-Gómez, A., Maina, M. F., & García-Crespo, O. (2021). Relationship between social media and digital resources of instruction in the university: comparative Spain – Colombia. Pixel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educacion, 60, 211-227. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.77522
  • Eom, S. (2022). The effects of the use of mobile devices on the E-learning process and perceived learning outcomes in university online education. E-Learning and Digital Media, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221107775
  • Figueroa, J. F., Huffman, L., Lozada, V., & Rosa-Dávila, E. (2022). Adopting VR in the Classroom: Perceptions of bilingual and ESL education pre-service teachers. EDMETIC, 11(1), art.10. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v11i1.13610
  • Hamidi, H., & Chavoshi, A. (2018). Analysis of the essential factors for the adoption of mobile learning in higher education: A case study of students of the University of Technology. Telematics and Informatics. 35(4), 1053-1070. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Tele.2017.09.016
  • Hwang, G. J., Zou, D., & Lin, J. (2020). Effects of a multi-level concept mapping-based question-posing approach on students’ ubiquitous learning performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 149, 103815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103815
  • Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
  • Kaliisa, R., Palmer, E., & Miller, J. (2019). Mobile learning in higher education: A comparative analysis of developed and developing country contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 546-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12583
  • Kellam, H. (2021). A conceptual framework and evaluation tool for mobile learning experiences. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 11(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJVPLE.2021010101
  • López-Noguero, F. (2002). El Análisis de contenido como método de investigación. XXI. Revista de Educación, 4, 167-179.
  • Mauri, M., Lafarga, P., Del Barrio, L., & Soler, R. (2022). Mobile learning and communication: educational change?; a systematic review. Education and Training, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2022-0110
  • Qashou, A. (2021). Influencing factors in M-learning adoption in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1755-1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-02010323-z
  • Razzaque, A. (2020). M-Learning Improves Knowledge Sharing Over e-Learning Platforms to Build Higher Education Students' Social Capital. Sage Open, 10(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020926575
  • Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., Aznar-Díaz, I., Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., & Cáceres-Reche, M. P. (2020b). Models of good teaching practices for mobile learning in higher education. Palgrave Communications, 6(80), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0468-6
  • Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., Aznar-Díaz, I., Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., & Gómez-García, G. (2020a). Mobile Learning in Higher Education: Structural Equation Model for Good Teaching Practices. IEEE Access, 8(1), 91761-91769. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2994967
  • Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., Aznar-Díaz, I., Trujillo-Torres, J. M., & Moreno-Guerrero, A. J. (2021). Best practices in the use of mobile learning by university teachers of didactics language-literature. Revista Conhecimento Online, 3, 6-25. https://doi.org/10.25112/RCO.V3.2772
  • Salcines-Talledo, I., González-Fernández, N., Díaz-Herrera, L., & Area-Moreira, M. (2022). Smartphones in Higher Education. A longitudinal qualitative study. Comunicar, 72, 115-127. https://doi.org/10.3916/C72-2022-09
  • Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2020). Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education. Computers and Education, 144, 103698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103698
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet